Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Ice Lake GT3e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.25
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT3eCoffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data7 October 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data50.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs86
TMUs3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

Ice Lake GT3e has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ice Lake GT3e and Iris Plus Graphics 645. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ice Lake GT3e is a desktop graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Ice Lake GT3e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 125 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Ice Lake GT3e or Iris Plus Graphics 645, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.