Apple M1 GPU vs Ice Lake GT3e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)no data
GPU code nameIce Lake GT3eno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data10 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5128
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memoryno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 GPU has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ice Lake GT3e and M1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ice Lake GT3e is a desktop graphics card while Apple M1 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Ice Lake GT3e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 475 votes

Rate M1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Ice Lake GT3e or M1 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.