Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs HD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics with Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics
2012
35 Watt
0.72

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics by a whopping 3258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1245269
Place by popularity85not in top-100
Power efficiency1.6023.55
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1TU106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 April 2012 (14 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482304
Core clock speed650 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors392 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate6.300198.7
Floating-point processing power0.1008 TFLOPS6.359 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs6144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.801.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 0.72
RTX 3000 Mobile 24.18
+3258%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 302
Samples: 854
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+3250%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 300
RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+4847%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−395
+4650%
4K2−388
+4300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 50−55
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55 50−55
Resident Evil 4 Remake 55−60 55−60

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 95−100 95−100
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 50−55
Far Cry 5 80−85 80−85
Fortnite 120−130 120−130
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 95−100
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55 50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100
Valorant 160−170 160−170

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 95−100 95−100
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 250−260
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 50−55
Dota 2 132 132
Far Cry 5 80−85 80−85
Fortnite 120−130 120−130
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 95−100
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90 85−90
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55 50−55
Metro Exodus 55−60 55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109 109
Valorant 160−170 160−170

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100 95−100
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 50−55
Dota 2 121 121
Far Cry 5 80−85 80−85
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 95−100
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55 50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56 56
Valorant 160−170 160−170

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130 120−130

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 50−55
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180 170−180
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50 45−50
Metro Exodus 30−35 30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 190−200 190−200

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 24−27
Far Cry 5 55−60 55−60
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 60−65
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30 27−30
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 40−45

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 60−65 60−65

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 24−27
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50 45−50
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 16−18
Metro Exodus 21−24 21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 35−40
Valorant 130−140 130−140

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 35−40
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 10−12
Dota 2 88 88
Far Cry 5 27−30 27−30
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 40−45
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 16−18
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 27−30

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 27−30

This is how HD Graphics and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 4650% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 4300% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 24.18
Recency 1 April 2012 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

HD Graphics has 56% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3258% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 45% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 3376 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 459 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics or Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.