ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 vs HD Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics with Mobility Radeon HD 4550, including specs and performance data.
HD Graphics outperforms Mobility HD 4550 by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1247 | 1377 |
| Place by popularity | 51 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.60 | no data |
| Architecture | Generation 7.0 (2012−2013) | Terascale 1 (2010) |
| GPU code name | Ivy Bridge GT1 | M92 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 April 2012 (14 years ago) | 1 January 2010 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 80 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 392 million | 242 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 6.300 | 4.400 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1008 TFLOPS | 0.088 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 1 | 4 |
| TMUs | 6 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Width | IGP | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 11.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 18−21
+80%
| 10 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | 5−6 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 27−30 |
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Dota 2 | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 27−30 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Dota 2 | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 27−30 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5 | 4−5 |
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Valorant | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 1−2 |
This is how HD Graphics and ATI Mobility HD 4550 compete in popular games:
- HD Graphics is 80% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 31 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.72 | 0.35 |
| Recency | 1 April 2012 | 1 January 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 55 nm |
HD Graphics has a 106% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.
The HD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
