GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample vs HD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1237not rated
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency1.59no data
ArchitectureGeneration 5.75 (2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameIronlakeNV36S
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2010 (16 years ago)18 August 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed166 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed373 MHzno data
Number of transistors177 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate5.9681.700
Floating-point processing power0.07162 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.19.0a
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL2.11.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 18 August 2003
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

HD Graphics has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 189% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700 Engineering Sample, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics and GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3261 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics or GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.