GeForce 8200M G vs HD Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics with GeForce 8200M G, including specs and performance data.
HD Graphics outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1245 | 1505 |
| Place by popularity | 85 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.60 | no data |
| Architecture | Generation 7.0 (2012−2013) | no data |
| GPU code name | Ivy Bridge GT1 | MCP77MV MCP79MVL |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 April 2012 (14 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 392 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 6.300 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1008 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 1 | no data |
| TMUs | 6 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | no data |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | no data |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 10 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 27−30 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 27−30 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 27−30 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 2−3 |
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K
High
| Far Cry 6 | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Valorant | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 1−2 |
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 25 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.72 | 0.16 |
| Recency | 1 April 2012 | 3 June 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 80 nm |
HD Graphics has a 350% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 73% more advanced lithography process.
The HD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8200M G is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
