Radeon RX Vega 3 vs HD Graphics (Skylake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated860
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.23
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameSkylake GT1Picasso
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)20 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12192
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data13.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4224 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 20 November 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics (Skylake) and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Skylake) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 3 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 5 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Skylake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2289 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Skylake) or Radeon RX Vega 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.