Radeon PRO V710 vs HD Graphics P4700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.59
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2013 (13 years ago)3 October 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1603456
Core clock speed350 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors392 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate10.40432.0
ROPs496
TMUs8216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cache512 KB54 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared28 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared224 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.9
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2013 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 158 Watt

HD Graphics P4700 has 46% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 77% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P4700 and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics P4700 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P4700 or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.