RTX A4000 Mobile vs HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) with RTX A4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
2012
0.58
RTX A4000 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
35.16
+5962%

RTX A4000 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) by a whopping 5962% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1285165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.66
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2012)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1GA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2012 (13 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores65120
Core clock speed350 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt
Texture fill rateno data268.8
Floating-point processing powerno data17.2 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−5456%
500−550
+5456%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8100%
80−85
+8100%
Palworld 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8100%
80−85
+8100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3325%
130−140
+3325%
Palworld 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1675%
140−150
+1675%
Valorant 27−30
−689%
210−220
+689%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 11
−2427%
270−280
+2427%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8100%
80−85
+8100%
Dota 2 10−12
−1182%
140−150
+1182%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3325%
130−140
+3325%
Metro Exodus 0−1 80−85
Palworld 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1675%
140−150
+1675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1950%
120−130
+1950%
Valorant 27−30
−689%
210−220
+689%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8100%
80−85
+8100%
Dota 2 10−12
−1182%
140−150
+1182%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3325%
130−140
+3325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1675%
140−150
+1675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1950%
120−130
+1950%
Valorant 27−30
−689%
210−220
+689%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−4250%
85−90
+4250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−8200%
240−250
+8200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2817%
170−180
+2817%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−9800%
95−100
+9800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 90−95
Palworld 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Valorant 6−7
−3500%
210−220
+3500%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and RTX A4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 5456% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A4000 Mobile is 9800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile performs better in 32 tests (51%)
  • there's a draw in 31 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 35.16
Recency 1 October 2012 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 22 nm 8 nm

RTX A4000 Mobile has a 5962% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 63 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 38 votes

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) or RTX A4000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.