ATI Radeon X600 SE vs HD Graphics (Broadwell)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics (Broadwell) with Radeon X600 SE, including specs and performance data.
HD Graphics (Broadwell) outperforms X600 SE by a whopping 642% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1208 | 1529 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.26 |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell (2015) | Rage 9 (2003−2006) |
| GPU code name | Broadwell GT1 | RV370 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 (11 years ago) | 1 September 2004 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 12 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 325 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 107 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 36 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1.300 |
| ROPs | no data | 4 |
| TMUs | no data | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 9.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2 |
| Valorant | 30−35
+700%
|
4−5 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
+667%
|
3−4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 30−35
+700%
|
4−5 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 30−35
+700%
|
4−5 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2 |
| Valorant | 4−5 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+650%
|
2−3 |
| Valorant | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.89 | 0.12 |
| Recency | 5 January 2015 | 1 September 2004 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 110 nm |
HD Graphics (Broadwell) has a 642% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 87% more advanced lithography process.
The HD Graphics (Broadwell) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X600 SE in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics (Broadwell) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X600 SE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
