GRID M60-8Q vs HD Graphics (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Braswell) with GRID M60-8Q, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Braswell)
2015
0.57

M60-8Q outperforms HD Graphics (Braswell) by a whopping 1535% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1286521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.20
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameBraswellGM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed320 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHz1178 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data150.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.825 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Palworld 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Palworld 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
Valorant 27−30
−1381%
400−450
+1381%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1511%
290−300
+1511%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dota 2 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Palworld 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
Valorant 27−30
−1381%
400−450
+1381%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dota 2 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
Valorant 27−30
−1381%
400−450
+1381%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Palworld 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1500%
240−250
+1500%
Valorant 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 9.32
Recency 1 April 2015 30 August 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics (Braswell) has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GRID M60-8Q, on the other hand, has a 1535% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

The GRID M60-8Q is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Braswell) is a notebook graphics card while GRID M60-8Q is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 18 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M60-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Braswell) or GRID M60-8Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.