RTX A4500 Mobile vs HD Graphics 510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Skylake) 500 505 510 515 520 530
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A3000 Mobile A3000 Mobile 12 GB A4000 Max-Q A4000 Mobile A4500 Embedded A4500 Max-Q A4500 Mobile A5000 Max-Q A5000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 510 with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 510
2015
32 GB LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
1.49
RTX A4500 Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 140 Watt
40.32
+2606%

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 510 by a whopping 2606% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1036119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.6822.28
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSkylake GT1GA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)22 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores965888
Core clock speed300 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors189 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80276.0
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPS17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs396
TMUs12184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cacheno data5.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 510 1.49
RTX A4500 Mobile 40.32
+2606%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 510 620
Samples: 1481
RTX A4500 Mobile 16799
+2610%
Samples: 448

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−22200%
220−230
+22200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Palworld 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 110−120

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3
−6700%
130−140
+6700%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−22200%
220−230
+22200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Fortnite 5−6
−3400%
170−180
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1850%
150−160
+1850%
Palworld 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1480%
150−160
+1480%
Valorant 35−40
−569%
230−240
+569%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3
−6700%
130−140
+6700%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−22200%
220−230
+22200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−742%
270−280
+742%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Dota 2 18−20
−711%
140−150
+711%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Fortnite 5−6
−3400%
170−180
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1850%
150−160
+1850%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−13200%
130−140
+13200%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4800%
95−100
+4800%
Palworld 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1480%
150−160
+1480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2014%
140−150
+2014%
Valorant 35−40
−569%
230−240
+569%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
−6700%
130−140
+6700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Dota 2 18−20
−711%
140−150
+711%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1850%
150−160
+1850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1480%
150−160
+1480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2014%
140−150
+2014%
Valorant 35−40
−569%
230−240
+569%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−3400%
170−180
+3400%
Palworld 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−2525%
100−110
+2525%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−2760%
280−290
+2760%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1067%
170−180
+1067%
Valorant 8−9
−3238%
260−270
+3238%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 45−50
Far Cry 5 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3800%
110−120
+3800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−5350%
100−110
+5350%
Palworld 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Valorant 9−10
−2667%
240−250
+2667%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
−5600%
110−120
+5600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2600%
50−55
+2600%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 22200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile performs better in 50 tests (79%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.49 40.32
Recency 1 September 2015 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 140 Watt

HD Graphics 510 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 833% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2606% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 510 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 510 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4850 Mobility Radeon HD 4850
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile
vs
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510
vs
GeForce 810A GeForce 810A
HD Graphics 4400 Intel Graphics 4400
vs
MX450 30.5W 10Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
HD Graphics 4400 Intel Graphics 4400
vs
UHD Graphics 770 770
HD Graphics 510 Intel Graphics 510
vs
GeForce 610 610
HD Graphics 510 Intel Graphics 510
vs
ATI HD 5450 PCI 5450 PCI
HD Graphics 510 Intel Graphics 510
vs
RX 560D 560D
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
vs
GRID K120Q K120Q
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
vs
Plex 7000 7000
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
vs
8300 GS 8300 GS
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
vs
GeForce 8300 8300
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
vs
RTX 3050 6 GB 3050 6 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 424 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 45 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 510 or RTX A4500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.