ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p vs HD Graphics 505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1206not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.22no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1.5R300
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2016 (9 years ago)1 July 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144no data
Core clock speed200 MHz324 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate11.702.592
Floating-point processing power0.1872 TFLOPSno data
ROPs38
TMUs188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP Pro 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared276 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data17.66 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2016 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 37 Watt

HD Graphics 505 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 971% more advanced lithography process, and 270% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 505 and FireGL 9700 X1-256p. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 505 is a notebook graphics card while FireGL 9700 X1-256p is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 295 votes

Rate HD Graphics 505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256p on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 505 or FireGL 9700 X1-256p, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.