Quadro NVS 280 PCI vs HD Graphics 405
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics 405 with Quadro NVS 280 PCI, including specs and performance data.
HD Graphics 405 outperforms 280 PCI by a whopping 3350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1245 | 1575 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 8.90 | 0.12 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) | Rankine (2003−2005) |
| GPU code name | Braswell GT1 | NV34 B1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2015 (11 years ago) | 28 October 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 275 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 45 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 9.600 | 1.100 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1536 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 2 | 2 |
| TMUs | 16 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCI |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DMS-59 |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 9.0a |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 1.5 (2.1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 15 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Palworld | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Palworld | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Palworld | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 27−30 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Epic
| Palworld | 4−5 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Palworld | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.69 | 0.02 |
| Recency | 1 April 2015 | 28 October 2003 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 13 Watt |
HD Graphics 405 has a 3350% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 971% more advanced lithography process, and 117% lower power consumption.
The HD Graphics 405 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 280 PCI in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics 405 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 280 PCI is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
