Jetson AGX Xavier vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1157not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.41no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1GV10B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)October 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speed320 MHz854 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1377 MHz
Number of transistors189 million9,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20044.06
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS1.41 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs1232
Tensor Coresno data64
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA-7.2
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 30 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 400% lower power consumption.

Jetson AGX Xavier, on the other hand, has a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Jetson AGX Xavier. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 459 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 16 votes

Rate Jetson AGX Xavier on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Jetson AGX Xavier, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.