GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 with GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 400
2015
8 GB DDR3L, 6 Watt
1.04
RTX 3060 Ti
2020, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 200 Watt
48.57
+4570%

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 4570% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115674
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.63
Power efficiency13.4118.79
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1GA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964864
Core clock speed320 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors189 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200253.1
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS16.2 TFLOPS
ROPs280
TMUs12152
Tensor Coresno data152
Ray Tracing Coresno data38
L1 Cacheno data4.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 400 1.04
RTX 3060 Ti 48.57
+4570%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 400 450
RTX 3060 Ti 29122
+6371%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−6650%
135
+6650%
1440p1−2
−7300%
74
+7300%
4K1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.96
1440pno data5.39
4Kno data8.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 344
+0%
344
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+0%
132
+0%
Palworld 186
+0%
186
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 172
+0%
172
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 330
+0%
330
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200
+0%
200
+0%
Palworld 157
+0%
157
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 224
+0%
224
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 196
+0%
196
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 110
+0%
110
+0%
Palworld 122
+0%
122
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 185
+0%
185
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Dota 2 135
+0%
135
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+0%
173
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 274
+0%
274
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Palworld 109
+0%
109
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150
+0%
150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 82
+0%
82
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 107
+0%
107
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
Palworld 61
+0%
61
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 103
+0%
103
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Palworld 44
+0%
44
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 400 and RTX 3060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is 6650% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 7300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 4700% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 48.57
Recency 1 April 2015 1 December 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 200 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 3233% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 4570% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 459 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19639 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.