ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1158not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.42no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1RV380
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed320 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2001.000
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x1
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared406 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data6.496 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VHDCI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.32.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 20 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 829% more advanced lithography process, and 233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and FireMV 2400 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 459 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or FireMV 2400 PCIe x1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.