Arc A570M vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1156not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.41no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)1 August 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962048
Core clock speed320 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors189 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200166.4
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS5.325 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs12128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 1 August 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 75 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 1150% lower power consumption.

Arc A570M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Arc A570M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 459 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 8 votes

Rate Arc A570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Arc A570M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.