GeForce GT 1010 vs HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) with GeForce GT 1010, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
2016
0.42

GT 1010 outperforms HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) by a whopping 455% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1335910
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.01
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBraswellGP108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2016 (10 years ago)13 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12256
Core clock speed320 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data23.49
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7516 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data147 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data40.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−400%
40−45
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Palworld 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Palworld 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Palworld 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Palworld 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Valorant 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

This is how HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) and GT 1010 compete in popular games:

  • GT 1010 is 400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 2.33
Recency 1 April 2016 13 January 2021

GT 1010 has a 455% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The GeForce GT 1010 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 1010 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 260 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 569 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) or GeForce GT 1010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.