H3C XG310 vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1278not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+DG1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2011 (15 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96768 ×4
Core clock speed650 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown300 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6052.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs224 ×4
TMUs1248 ×4
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2133 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.26 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 11 November 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm

H3C XG310 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 3000 and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2945 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 3000 or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.