Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.61

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 1708% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1278475
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)no data
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+Panther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (15 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9632
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate15.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2no data
TMUs12no data
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)no data
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 3000 0.61
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 11.03
+1708%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 3000 2503
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 39648
+1484%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−244%
31
+244%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Palworld 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Palworld 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Valorant 27−30
−261%
100−110
+261%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 11
−1373%
160−170
+1373%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Dota 2 8
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Metro Exodus 0−1 21−24
Palworld 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Valorant 27−30
−261%
100−110
+261%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Dota 2 7
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Valorant 27−30
−1686%
500−550
+1686%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−2700%
80−85
+2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 24−27
Palworld 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Valorant 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 244% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 2700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU performs better in 28 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 11.03
Recency 1 February 2011 5 January 2026

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 1708% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 14 years.

The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2945 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 3000 or Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.