T400 4 GB vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 with T400 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.65

T400 4 GB outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 1306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1260529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.57
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1TU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2012 (14 years ago)6 May 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48384
Core clock speed650 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors392 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown30 Watt
Texture fill rate6.90034.20
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs624
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.801.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−1275%
110−120
+1275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Palworld 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Palworld 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Valorant 27−30
−1150%
350−400
+1150%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Palworld 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Valorant 27−30
−1150%
350−400
+1150%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Valorant 27−30
−1150%
350−400
+1150%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Palworld 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1300%
210−220
+1300%
Valorant 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and T400 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • T400 4 GB is 1275% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 9.14
Recency 1 April 2012 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm

T400 4 GB has a 1306% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 83% more advanced lithography process.

The T400 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a desktop graphics card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1643 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 102 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2500 or T400 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.