GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs HD Graphics 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 with GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.51
RTX 4070 SUPER
2024, $599
12 GB GDDR6X, 220 Watt
71.42
+13904%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 13904% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131417
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.76
Power efficiencyno data25.32
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1AD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (15 years ago)8 January 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores487168
Core clock speed850 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors189 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown220 Watt
Texture fill rate8.100554.4
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPS35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs180
TMUs6224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data7 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 2000 0.51
RTX 4070 SUPER 71.42
+13904%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 2000 213
Samples: 1
RTX 4070 SUPER 29940
+13956%
Samples: 16290

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11214
+1845%
1440p0−1133
4K0−181

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.80
1440pno data4.50
4Kno data7.40

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 196
+19500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 160−170
+3220%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 184
+18300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 290−300
+7225%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 160−170
+3220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 170−180
+2063%
Valorant 27−30 400−450
+1428%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18 270−280
+1535%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 159
+15800%
Dota 2 10−12 1500−1550
+13536%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 290−300
+7225%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 160−170
+3220%
Metro Exodus 0−1 185
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 170−180
+2063%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 412
+6767%
Valorant 27−30 400−450
+1428%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 144
+14300%
Dota 2 10−12 1500−1550
+13536%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 290−300
+7225%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 160−170
+3220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 170−180
+2063%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 201
+3250%
Valorant 27−30 400−450
+1428%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 230−240
+11400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 500−550
+25700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 170−180
+3400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 250−260
+25700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 154
+15300%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 150−160

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 166
+1007%
Valorant 5−6 300−350
+6260%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 95−100
+9500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Resident Evil 4 Remake 220−230 220−230

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Far Cry 5 203 203
Fortnite 300−350 300−350

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Far Cry 5 200 200
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 173 173

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Far Cry 5 190 190

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 148 148
Metro Exodus 118 118
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 92 92
Far Cry 5 183 183
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110 100−110

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 100−110
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60 55−60
Metro Exodus 74 74
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133 133

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 100−110 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 44 44
Far Cry 5 103 103
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 210−220
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60 55−60

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 1845% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 25700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER performs better in 29 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 31 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 71.42
Recency 1 February 2011 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

RTX 4070 SUPER has a 13904% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 84% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1508 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7913 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2000 or GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.