Radeon RX 9050 vs H3C XG310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameDG1Navi 44
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 November 2020 (5 years ago)28 July 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768 ×41024
Core clock speed1050 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt92 Watt
Texture fill rate52.80 ×4166.4
Floating-point processing power1.69 TFLOPS ×4no data
ROPs24 ×464
TMUs48 ×464
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit ×4128 Bit
Memory clock speed2133 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s ×4288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2020 28 July 2026
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 92 Watt

RX 9050 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 226% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between H3C XG310 and Radeon RX 9050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that H3C XG310 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9050 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about H3C XG310 or Radeon RX 9050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.