RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs H3C XG310
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | DG1 | AD107 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2020 (5 years ago) | 21 March 2023 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 ×4 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 2010 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 18,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 ×4 | 193.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.69 TFLOPS ×4 | 12.35 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 ×4 | 48 |
| TMUs | 48 ×4 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 96 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 24 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 12 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB ×4 | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit ×4 | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s ×4 | 256.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 November 2020 | 21 March 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 50 Watt |
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between H3C XG310 and RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that H3C XG310 is a workstation graphics card while RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
