CMP 30HX vs H3C XG310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.82
Power efficiencyno data9.05
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDG1TU116
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 November 2020 (5 years ago)25 February 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768 ×41408
Core clock speed1050 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate52.80 ×4157.1
Floating-point processing power1.69 TFLOPS ×45.027 TFLOPS
ROPs24 ×448
TMUs48 ×488
L1 Cacheno data1.4 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB1536 KB
L3 Cache16 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×46 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit ×4192 Bit
Memory clock speed2133 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s ×4336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2020 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 125 Watt

H3C XG310 has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between H3C XG310 and CMP 30HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 55 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about H3C XG310 or CMP 30HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.