Tesla S1070 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCrestlineGT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 May 2007 (19 years ago)1 June 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8240 ×4
Core clock speed500 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13.5 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rateno data48.80 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPsno data32 ×4
TMUsno data80 ×4
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB ×4
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 800 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 has 6054% lower power consumption.

Tesla S1070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Tesla S1070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla S1070 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 164 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Tesla S1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or Tesla S1070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.