Quadro P520 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated693
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.84
ArchitectureGen. 3 (2005)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGMA 950GP108
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2005 (21 years ago)23 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4384
Core clock speedno data1303 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rateno data35.83
Floating-point processing powerno data1.147 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2005 23 May 2019
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 18 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 has 157% lower power consumption.

Quadro P520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 and Quadro P520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 83 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 115 votes

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 or Quadro P520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.