GRID RTX T10-2 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 3 (2005)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGMA 950TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2005 (21 years ago)2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43584
Core clock speedno data1065 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data312.5
Floating-point processing powerno data9.999 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 150 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 has 2043% lower power consumption.

GRID RTX T10-2, on the other hand, has a 983% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 and GRID RTX T10-2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 is a notebook graphics card while GRID RTX T10-2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 83 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 56 votes

Rate GRID RTX T10-2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 or GRID RTX T10-2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.