Quadro P500 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated758
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.02
ArchitectureGen. 3 (2005)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGMA 900GP108
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2005 (21 years ago)5 January 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4256
Core clock speedno data1455 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1518 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.29
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7772 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2005 5 January 2018
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm

Quadro P500 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 and Quadro P500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P500 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 21 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 32 votes

Rate Quadro P500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 or Quadro P500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.