Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Contents
Share:
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011) | no data |
| GPU code name | Cedar Trail | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 November 2011 (14 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 640 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | no data |
| L2 Cache | no data | 384 KB |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
