GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated176
Place by popularitynot in top-10085
Power efficiencyno data52.05
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameCedar TrailGB207
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2011 (14 years ago)24 June 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42560
Core clock speedno data1020 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data16.9 billion
Manufacturing process technology32 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data120.0
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.9
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 24 June 2025
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

RTX 5050 Mobile has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 30 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 477 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 or GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.