Apple M4 8-core GPU vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 4 (2007−2010) | no data |
| GPU code name | Pineview | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 10 January 2010 (16 years ago) | 28 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 200 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 123 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 4 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | LPDDR5X-7500 |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2010 | 28 October 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 3 nm |
Apple M4 8-core GPU has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 and M4 8-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
