Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Qualcomm Adreno X2-85, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
2023
9.43

Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 outperforms Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking512413
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023−2025)no data
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (2 years ago)29 September 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4no data
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1700 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nmno data
L1 Cache768 KBno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 9.43
Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 14.03
+48.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 6291
Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 8565
+36.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 5131
Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 7617
+48.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−110%
42
+110%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−54.9%
75−80
+54.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Palworld 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
−47.6%
60−65
+47.6%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−54.9%
75−80
+54.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 24
−95.8%
45−50
+95.8%
Fortnite 55−60
−42.1%
80−85
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
Palworld 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−52.9%
50−55
+52.9%
Valorant 90−95
−29.7%
110−120
+29.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
−47.6%
60−65
+47.6%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−54.9%
75−80
+54.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−33.3%
190−200
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 22
−114%
45−50
+114%
Fortnite 55−60
−42.1%
80−85
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−200%
45
+200%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Palworld 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−52.9%
50−55
+52.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−23.3%
35−40
+23.3%
Valorant 90−95
−29.7%
110−120
+29.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−47.6%
60−65
+47.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 21
−124%
45−50
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−52.9%
50−55
+52.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−131%
35−40
+131%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−42.1%
80−85
+42.1%
Palworld 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−47.2%
100−110
+47.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−69.2%
21−24
+69.2%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Valorant 95−100
−40.6%
130−140
+40.6%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−55%
30−35
+55%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
−55%
30−35
+55%
Palworld 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Palworld 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Valorant 40−45
−64.3%
65−70
+64.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Palworld 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%

This is how Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 is 110% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 surpassed Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.43 14.03
Recency 14 December 2023 29 September 2025

Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 has a 49% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) or Qualcomm Adreno X2-85, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.