Quadro4 380 XGL vs GeForce4 Ti 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 Ti 4200 with Quadro4 380 XGL, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 Ti 4200
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15901582
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNV25 A2NV18 A4
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 February 2002 (24 years ago)12 November 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors63 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate2.0001.100
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount64 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz256 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s8.192 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.18.0
OpenGL1.31.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 Ti 4200 0.01
Quadro4 380 XGL 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 Ti 4200 5
Samples: 55
Quadro4 380 XGL 6
+20%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 12 November 2002
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 128 MB

Quadro4 380 XGL has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce4 Ti 4200 and Quadro4 380 XGL.

Be aware that GeForce4 Ti 4200 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 380 XGL is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 64 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 290 votes

Rate Quadro4 380 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 Ti 4200 or Quadro4 380 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.