ATI FireGL V7350 vs GeForce4 MX 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1592not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNV17 A3R520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 February 2002 (24 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors29 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data111 Watt
Texture fill rate1.2009.600
ROPs216
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed225 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.09.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 90 nm

ATI FireGL V7350 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 460 and FireGL V7350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 460 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7350 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX 460 or FireGL V7350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.