Tesla S1075 vs GeForce4 MX 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1601not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV17 A3GT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 February 2002 (24 years ago)1 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240 ×4
Core clock speed250 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors29 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data800 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00048.80 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs232 ×4
TMUs480 ×4
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed166 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 55 nm

Tesla S1075 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 173% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 420 and Tesla S1075. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 420 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla S1075 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla S1075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX 420 or Tesla S1075, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.