ATI FireGL T2-64S vs GeForce4 MX 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1593not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNV17 A3RV350
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 February 2002 (24 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz324 MHz
Number of transistors29 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate1.0001.296
ROPs24
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount64 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz203 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s6.496 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x LFH60

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.09.0 (9_0)
OpenGL1.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 1 October 2003
Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

ATI FireGL T2-64S has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 15% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 420 and FireGL T2-64S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 420 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL T2-64S is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL T2-64S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX 420 or FireGL T2-64S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.