UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs GeForce4 460 Go
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce4 460 Go and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms GeForce4 460 Go by a whopping 21200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1592 | 935 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 16.49 |
| Architecture | Celsius (1999−2005) | Gen. 11 (2021) |
| GPU code name | NV17 A5 | Gen. 11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 October 2002 (23 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 250 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 29 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 4.8 - 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.000 | no data |
| ROPs | 2 | no data |
| TMUs | 4 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 250 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 8.0 | 12_1 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 13 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 5−6 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−64%
|
40−45
+64%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−378%
|
40−45
+378%
|
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−143%
|
17
+143%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−60%
|
8
+60%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−64%
|
40−45
+64%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−129%
|
16
+129%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+25%
|
4
−25%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−64%
|
40−45
+64%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 21−24 |
1440p
Ultra
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce4 460 Go is 25% faster.
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 450% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GeForce4 460 Go performs better in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) performs better in 19 tests (40%)
- there's a draw in 28 tests (58%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.01 | 2.13 |
| Recency | 14 October 2002 | 11 January 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has a 21200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 460 Go in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
