Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs GeForce4 460 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
410 Go 420 Go 440 Go 448 Go 460 Go 488 Go
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
B370 B390 G3 G3 Extreme Graphics 2 Xe Mobile Graphics 4 Xe Mobile Pro B370 Pro B390 Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 460 Go and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 460 Go
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms GeForce4 460 Go by a whopping 114500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce4 460 Go GeForce4 460 Go
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1592467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)no data
GPU code nameNV17 A5Panther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 October 2002 (23 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores232
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Boost clock speed250 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors29 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nmno data
Texture fill rate1.000no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount64 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.0no data
OpenGL1.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−131

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 0−1 27−30

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 0−1 27−30
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−308%
100−110
+308%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 0−1 27−30
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−1756%
160−170
+1756%
Dota 2 7−8
−114186%
8000−8050
+114186%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−308%
100−110
+308%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 7−8
−114186%
8000−8050
+114186%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−114500%
28650−28700
+114500%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Valorant 4−5
−1250%
50−55
+1250%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU performs better in 17 tests (32%)
  • there's a draw in 36 tests (68%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.01 11.46
Recency 14 October 2002 5 January 2026

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 114500% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 23 years.

The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 460 Go in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce4 460 Go GeForce4 460 Go
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GeForce4 460 Go GeForce4 460 Go
vs
ATI IGP 320M Radeon IGP 320M
HD 6570M Mac Edition Radeon HD 6570M Mac Edition
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
ATI Mobility X2300 HD Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
8600M GT Mac Edition GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition
vs
RTX 2070 Super RTX 2070 Super
8600M GT Mac Edition GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition
vs
RTX 2080 Super RTX 2080 Super
Go 7900 SE GeForce Go 7900 SE
vs
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT
GeForce4 488 Go GeForce4 488 Go
vs
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
GeForce4 488 Go GeForce4 488 Go
vs
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
ATI FireGL V3200 FireGL V3200
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
ATI V9800 FirePro V9800
vs
Pro WX 9200 Pro WX 9200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 460 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 460 Go or Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.