Arc A550M vs GeForce4 440 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
410 Go 420 Go 440 Go 448 Go 460 Go 488 Go
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A350M A370M A380M A530M A550M A570M A730M A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 440 Go and Arc A550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 440 Go
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

A550M outperforms GeForce4 440 Go by a whopping 226800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce4 440 Go GeForce4 440 Go
Arc A550M Arc A550M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1602280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.25
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV17 A5DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (24 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22048
Core clock speed220 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed220 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors29 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rate0.88262.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed220 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.04 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Palworld 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%

Full HD
Medium

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Palworld 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Valorant 21−24
−600%
160−170
+600%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2711%
250−260
+2711%
Dota 2 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Palworld 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Valorant 21−24
−600%
160−170
+600%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Valorant 21−24
−600%
160−170
+600%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 170−180

1440p
Ultra

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3600%
35−40
+3600%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−187%
40−45
+187%
Valorant 4−5
−3075%
120−130
+3075%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A550M is 4800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A550M performs better in 24 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 40 tests (63%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.01 22.69
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm

Arc A550M has a 226800% higher aggregate performance score, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A550M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 440 Go in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce4 440 Go GeForce4 440 Go
vs
RX 570 Mobile Radeon RX 570 Mobile
Arc A550M Arc A550M
vs
Arc Pro B390 Arc Pro B390
GeForce4 440 Go GeForce4 440 Go
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3400 Mobility Radeon HD 3400
GeForce4 440 Go NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go
vs
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
GeForce4 440 Go NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go
vs
STG STG
GeForce4 440 Go NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go
vs
R3 Mobile Graphics R3 Mobile Graphics
GeForce4 440 Go NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
GeForce4 440 Go NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go
vs
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT
GeForce4 440 Go NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go
vs
RTX A5500 Max-Q RTX A5500 Max-Q
GeForce4 440 Go NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go
vs
RTX A2000 Max-Q RTX A2000 Max-Q
GeForce2 Go 100 NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
vs
RTX 8200 RTX 8200
GeForce2 Go 100 NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
vs
A40 PCIe A40 PCIe
GeForce2 Go 100 NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
vs
T600 T600

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 2 votes

Rate GeForce4 440 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 102 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 440 Go or Arc A550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.