RTX A4500 vs GeForce4 4200 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 4200 Go with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 4200 Go
2002
128 MB DDR
0.01

RTX A4500 outperforms GeForce4 4200 Go by a whopping 495000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking160471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.15
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV28MGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 November 2002 (23 years ago)23 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores67168
Core clock speed2 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed200 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data369.6
Floating-point processing powerno data23.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data7 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data640.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 4200 Go 0.01
RTX A4500 49.51
+495000%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 4200 Go 3
Samples: 8
RTX A4500 20625
+687400%
Samples: 575

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Palworld 2−3
−494900%
9900−9950
+494900%

Full HD
Medium

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−494900%
9900−9950
+494900%
Palworld 2−3
−494900%
9900−9950
+494900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−494900%
34650−34700
+494900%
Valorant 21−24
−494900%
113850−113900
+494900%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−494900%
44550−44600
+494900%
Dota 2 7−8
−494900%
34650−34700
+494900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−494900%
9900−9950
+494900%
Palworld 2−3
−494900%
9900−9950
+494900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−494900%
34650−34700
+494900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−494900%
24750−24800
+494900%
Valorant 21−24
−494900%
113850−113900
+494900%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 7−8
−494900%
34650−34700
+494900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−494900%
9900−9950
+494900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−494900%
34650−34700
+494900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−494900%
24750−24800
+494900%
Valorant 21−24
−494900%
113850−113900
+494900%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 2−3
−494900%
9900−9950
+494900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−494900%
4950−5000
+494900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−494900%
4950−5000
+494900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−494900%
74250−74300
+494900%
Valorant 4−5
−494900%
19800−19850
+494900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−494900%
4950−5000
+494900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−494900%
4950−5000
+494900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 49.51
Recency 15 November 2002 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX A4500 has a 495000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 4200 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 4200 Go is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce4 4200 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 218 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 4200 Go or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.