Arc 3 A370M vs GeForce4 420 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1604not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV17 A5DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 February 2002 (24 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores21024
Core clock speed200 MHzno data
Boost clock speed190 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors29 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate0.899.20
Floating-point processing powerno data3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm

Arc 3 A370M has an age advantage of 20 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 420 Go and Arc 3 A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 420 Go is a notebook graphics card while Arc 3 A370M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce4 420 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Arc 3 A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 420 Go or Arc 3 A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.