Quadro4 900 XGL vs GeForce2 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce2 Ti with Quadro4 900 XGL, including specs and performance data.

GeForce2 Ti
2001
64 MB DDR
0.01

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16001605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameNV15 A5NV25 A2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2001 (25 years ago)19 February 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors25 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate2.0002.400
ROPs48
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 4x
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount64 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz325 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s10.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.08.1
OpenGL1.21.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce2 Ti 0.01
Quadro4 900 XGL 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce2 Ti 4
Samples: 5
Quadro4 900 XGL 4
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2001 19 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 128 MB

Quadro4 900 XGL has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce2 Ti and Quadro4 900 XGL.

Be aware that GeForce2 Ti is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 900 XGL is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 votes

Rate GeForce2 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 900 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 Ti or Quadro4 900 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.