Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce2 MX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1615276
Place by popularitynot in top-10078
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.11
Power efficiencyno data16.73
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV11 A2Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2000 (26 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed175 MHz2610 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2815 MHz
Number of transistors20 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data107 Watt
Texture fill rate0.7180.2
ROPs232
TMUs464
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2248 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s143.9 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce2 MX 2
Samples: 3
RX 6500 XT 9613
+480550%
Samples: 3377

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HDno data63
1440pno data31
4Kno data17

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.16
1440pno data6.42
4Kno data11.71

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 111 111
Counter-Strike 2 281 281
Cyberpunk 2077 72 72

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 84 84
Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Counter-Strike 2 194 194
Cyberpunk 2077 54 54
Far Cry 5 102 102
Fortnite 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 90−95
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 90−95
Valorant 160−170 160−170

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 48 48
Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Counter-Strike 2 82 82
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 250−260
Cyberpunk 2077 34 34
Dota 2 145 145
Far Cry 5 92 92
Far Cry 6 15 15
Fortnite 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 90−95
Grand Theft Auto V 86 86
Metro Exodus 52 52
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 90−95
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92 92
Valorant 160−170 160−170

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 30 30
Dota 2 110 110
Far Cry 5 86 86
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 90−95
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 90−95
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 54
Valorant 160−170 160−170

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 110−120

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35 35
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 6 5 5
Grand Theft Auto V 37 37
Metro Exodus 18 18
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 190−200 190−200

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 17 17
Far Cry 5 57 57
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 60−65
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 35−40

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 55−60

4K
High

Atomic Heart 18−20 18−20
Counter-Strike 2 7 7
Far Cry 6 2 2
Grand Theft Auto V 34 34
Metro Exodus 11 11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 28
Valorant 130−140 130−140

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 35−40
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 21−24
Cyberpunk 2077 4 4
Dota 2 67 67
Far Cry 5 23 23
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 24−27

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 24−27

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2000 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 6 nm

RX 6500 XT has an age advantage of 21 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 97% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX and Radeon RX 6500 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 29 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3954 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX or Radeon RX 6500 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.