GeForce MX250 vs GeForce2 MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1626666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data44.13
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV11 A2GP108B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2000 (26 years ago)20 February 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed175 MHz937 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1038 MHz
Number of transistors20 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate0.724.91
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs424
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce2 MX 2
Samples: 3
GeForce MX250 2372
+118500%
Samples: 3120

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HDno data22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 75 75
Cyberpunk 2077 14 14
Hogwarts Legacy 15 15
Resident Evil 4 Remake 13 13

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24 24
Counter-Strike 2 41 41
Cyberpunk 2077 11 11
Far Cry 5 19 19
Fortnite 55 55
Forza Horizon 4 31 31
Hogwarts Legacy 8 8
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 28 28
Valorant 118 118

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 19 19
Counter-Strike 2 21 21
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100 95−100
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 12−14
Dota 2 64 64
Far Cry 5 17 17
Fortnite 25 25
Forza Horizon 4 24 24
Grand Theft Auto V 28 28
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 10−12
Metro Exodus 7 7
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23 23
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21 21
Valorant 115 115

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14 14
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 12−14
Dota 2 57 57
Far Cry 5 16 16
Forza Horizon 4 16 16
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 10−12
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 19 19
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12 12
Valorant 65−70 65−70

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 22 22

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 10−12
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45 40−45
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 5−6
Metro Exodus 5−6 5−6
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 35−40
Valorant 55−60 55−60

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 4−5
Far Cry 5 10−12 10−12
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 12−14
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 7−8

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12 10−12

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 16−18
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 1−2
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 3−4
Valorant 24−27 24−27

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 1−2
Dota 2 20−22 20−22
Far Cry 5 5−6 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 8−9
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 6−7

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7 6−7

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2000 20 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

GeForce MX250 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 92% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX and GeForce MX250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX is a desktop graphics card while GeForce MX250 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 29 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1739 votes

Rate GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX or GeForce MX250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.