Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs GeForce2 MX + nForce 420

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameCrush11Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 June 2001 (25 years ago)10 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data14336
Core clock speed175 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors20 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data450 Watt
Texture fill rate0.71,389
Floating-point processing powerno data44.44 TFLOPS
ROPs2no data
TMUs4896
Tensor Coresno data896
Ray Tracing Coresno data112
L1 Cacheno data56 MB
L2 Cacheno data408 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPOAM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2,458 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2001 10 January 2023
Chip lithography 180 nm 10 nm

Data Center GPU Max 1350 has an age advantage of 21 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 and Data Center GPU Max 1350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 is a desktop graphics card while Data Center GPU Max 1350 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 or Data Center GPU Max 1350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.