Quadro FX 3000G vs GeForce2 MX PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNV11 A2NV35
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2000 (26 years ago)22 July 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed175 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors20 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate0.73.200
ROPs24
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 8x
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB256 MB
Memory bus width32 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth664.0 MB/s27.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.09.0a
OpenGL1.21.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2000 22 July 2003
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 130 nm

FX 3000G has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX PCI and Quadro FX 3000G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX PCI is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 3000G is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 11 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX PCI or Quadro FX 3000G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.