Xe Arctic Sound vs GeForce2 MX 200 LP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameNV11 B3Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 March 2001 (25 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed175 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors20 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt
Texture fill rate0.7230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs2128
TMUs4256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount32 MB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s1,229 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 10 nm

Xe Arctic Sound has a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 200 LP and Xe Arctic Sound. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xe Arctic Sound on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX 200 LP or Xe Arctic Sound, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.