RTX A2000 Mobile vs GeForce2 MX 200 LP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated282
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.44
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV11 B3GA107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date3 March 2001 (25 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed175 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1687 MHz
Number of transistors20 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt
Texture fill rate0.7135.0
Floating-point processing powerno data8.637 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 8 nm

RTX A2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 20 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 200 LP and RTX A2000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX 200 LP is a desktop graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 142 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX 200 LP or RTX A2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.